Friday, June 6, 2008

Reality

How do we define reality?
"Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away." --Philip K. Dick
"Things that are real, are things that will never change." --Parmenides
"Change is Reality, Reality is Change." --Heraclitus
"Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a very persistant one." --Albert Einstein

Over the years many people have tried to define reality in their own way, what seems ideally suited to their own set of beliefs, THAT is where the paradox lies - Reality is what you THINK it is. You might begin to wonder, if reality is what is percieved then reality becomes relative.YES, reality is relative. Just look backwards, what you think is real is what you have been told is real.
Lets take a simple example, You look at a shiny gold box. All your senses tell you something about the box, your eyes tell you that the box is shiny and gold, your fingers tell you that it is smooth and solid, etc etc. Hence according to you this description becomes a reality - That the box is shiny, smooth, solid and golden. Lets take another person, similar in intelligence, height, weight, academic background, hometown etc etc. but the only problem is that he is colour blind(completely, he can only see black, white and shades of grey). Now when this person looks at the same box his senses tell him nearly the same story, the box is solid,smooth and shiny but he doesn't see the box to be gold in colour, what he can see is a shiny grey box. This becomes his reality. But, as an interesting turn of events, the box inherently does not possess any of these qualities. Ultimately - up close it is a storm of sub-atomic particles, and we only perceive it to be shiny and golden(or grey) because of some other quality in the material that makes the IDEA of shiny and golden apparent to us. This brings us back to the original statement, what both of them percieved as reality is, in fact, not the ultimate reality but it is what their senses told them is real.

Right from the time we're born, our senses are constantly bombarded with information. All this information is open to interpretation. Whatever our brain interprets is registered as a system of beliefs, and this system of beliefs becomes our reality.Who makes these so called "belief systems"? We live in a society in which spurious realities are manufactured by the media, by governments, by big corporations, by religious groups, political groups — and the electronic hardware exists by which to deliver these pseudo-Realities right into the heads of the reader, the viewer, the listener. Our constant thirst for information has proved favourable to the manufacturers of these realities, who use these channels of information to dissipate information and in turn cause us to create realities for ourselves. All of us agree to the fact that every person is unique and same piece of information is liable to be interpreted differently(like in the example of the golden box). but the "accepted" reality is the most common interpretation, i.e. what a maximum number of people percieve to be real. These "commonly accepted" realities become religions, laws, rules , ethics, morals and truths within a society. (In a city FULL of homicidal maniacs, would murder be a crime? think about it.)

But the fact of the matter remains that reality is still relative, and what may be true/believable to a certain number of people may not the same to certain others. This conflict in perception of reality causes segregation. When we are born into a group with a certain belief system we are conditioned so as to build the same belief system as the rest of the pack, and however intelligent we may be, we aren't able to break the shackles of our own belief system. eg: Suppose we come across a theory that shakes the very foundation of our belief system(Galileo and the Pope), what do we do? do we accept the new theory with open arms and modify our belief system instantaneously? No we don't. We fight it, although every ounce of logic suggests that the new theory is correct, we refuse to believe it. Why? because our belief system is not conditioned to accept it that quickly. This totally breaks open the concept of free will doesn't it? We want to believe it but we cant? how did that happen? Free will in my words is just rationalization of an act that has already been done. in simpler words your "Free Will" is dictated by your belief system, a system created by the group in which you were born, which means that the choices you make using "Free Will" has already been made for you by the creators of this belief system. How does that make you feel? Angry? Sad? Surprised? Unfortunately even these reactions are a result of an inconsistency between my opinions and your belief system. Although my statements seem very logical and seem to reach a sufficient conclusion, you will never really completely believe what i have said. "Free Will", for all practical purposes, is non-existent.

We have now established that reality is an illusion you have created for yourself, to protect your collective beliefs, thoughts and ideals. We arrive a startling question, In a world where reality itself is not real, what is? I'd like to propose a theory here, There is a Reality that transcends all the parallel realities that we have created. Lets say you are asleep and dreaming. Suppose that in this dream you are having a conversation with your friend. Although its your friend who is in the dream, it is your brain that is doing the thinking for him . Which means that you are thinking for yourself and your friend in the dream i.e. your consciousness is divided into two in that dream, one for yourself and one for your friend. If there are three people in the dream, your consciousness is divided into three, and so on. Lets say you are having a very vivid and detailed dream about a busy market scene, your consciousness is divided between every entity present in that scene, animate or inanimate. Your brain is the source of every complex movement, emotion, action and reaction that is occurring in that scene. i.e. your brain creates REALITIES for every entity in your dream. These realities you created for them serve as barriers that hide them from the fact that YOU are the ultimate reality, YOU are the creator, YOU are the destroyer and their realities do not surpass yours.

"Last night I dreamt that I was a beautiful butterfly fluttering through the fields. Now I awaken. My question is this; how do I know if I am Chuang Tzu, who dreamt himself a butterfly, or if I am a butterfly, now dreaming itself Chuang Tzu?" --Chuang Tzu, Chinese Taoist Philosopher

Thinking along these same lines, we realize that, our universe is just a part of a SUPREME consciousness. The Consciousness that has created us and our universe. Each and every one of our actions and inactions is governed by this supreme consciousness. THIS is our Ultimate Reality, The Reality of the Divine, the Infinite, the Almighty, God or any other word that has been to use to describe this Reality. What is being fed to you on a daily basis as "reality" is just a barrier between you and the Ultimate. Free your mind, free yourself from the cage of your own thoughts. Our existence is nothing but an endless pursuit to realize and recognize its existence and to gain immortality by merging with the Ultimate.

18 comments:

Sneha said...

hmmmmmmmmmmm,u started thinking finally

abstract said...

have you considered that the conclusion you have reached about the concept of 'free will' has been tainted by your set of beliefs as well? extending your premise of logic, as in the case of 'free will', logic itself is just a perceived and not concluded, don't you think?
You have a paradox here, sort of:
the logic which denies the concept of Free Will cannot be guaranteed to be the absolute truth. Hence Free Will both exists and does not - like the Schroedinger's cat

abstract said...

just to clear this out - i don't intend to start a flame war. It is not possible to oppose or support a viewpoint. Viewpoints just exist, and I am just saying that another viewpoint exists, not to say that it opposes yours, it just exists.

krishNONE said...

I shall offer an explanation which i did not include in the post because, ykno, it was already too long! :D
off late, i've been talking to many people of many faiths, i had a question to which no one was able to give a satisfactory answer.
General belief says that god can do only good, AND God created EVERYTHING
so, where did EVIL come from?
the only logical explanation was that God CREATED evil !
now when i arrive at such a radical conclusion, most people go into denial and accuse me of blasphemy, judgment, hell and all that.
I always wanted a model where everything fits good/evil right/wrong etc etc. Upon some thought and a bit of research (inspired mostly by joblessness and boredom)i hit upon the theory of supreme consciousness as written in the Hindu Vedas. BUT as far as i have read, there is no explanation for the concept of free will.
So i tried to mould the concept of free will to fit into this theory, by using some very believable and acceptable examples.
and as you rightly said, even im not out to ENFORCE my opinion, its just an opinion.
i havent yet finished reading up on all the vedas, maybe after im done i'd be able to offer a more satisfactory explanation.

and btw
Thats a very good argument! i completely agree.
\m/

krishNONE said...

im not able to access your profile..
do i know you?

krishNONE said...

Phantoms in the Brain
-Vilayanur S. Ramachandran
read this book if you get your hands on it, supports my theory a bit.

abstract said...

GOD: I would like to put in my 2 cents, even though it has nothing to do with the point you are making. Allow me:
GOD created EVIL.. going by the Hindu concept of God being supreme, you can safely say that if GOD can be supremely good, he can be supremely evil as well. And, I think that it is right, God is neutral in all respects, hence he must be the extreme in all respects to support neutrality. If anyone says otherwise, he is being closed-minded(ingredient of a fundamentalist). And yeah, the Hindu mythological fundamental faction would not support this, but the likes of those who are into mystic studies do. That is the reason you have deities who are worshipped through really 'dark means'.
Going on to the point you made..

abstract said...

concept of Free Will, going by your logical premise, is a paradox. And as you have said about 'reality', it is all about perspective.

Someone with the perspective of a third-person, an observer above men would not see the existence of Free Will. It is all just a game of billiards.
But for the first person residing in the active entities, Free Will is a stark truth. For him, it is possible to break out of the cycle of cause and action, or so he percieves.
Now, both of these are just perspectives. You have followed one line of thought and have given an opinion. But then, neither of them can be validated-or falsified.

krishNONE said...

That is exactly the point i'm trying to make.
BUT WHO is this "Third-person/ observer above men" ? that is the question im trying to address through my post.
According to my post, this person is the master manipulator, free-will is non existent through his eyes, and his consciousness is the ultimate, UNCHANGING consciousness (REF : Dream-World to Real-World Analogy)
But for the active entities, realities CHANGE, based on perception. If our reality is not constant, then what should we believe to be REAL? Thats where we introduce an abstract entity, God/Almighty/Divine etc etc, who we accept as the observer/the third person.

krishNONE said...

In the dream-world to real-world analogy,i said that the entities in your dream are not aware of the fact that they are in a dream. And your brain CREATES realities for them to hide them from this very fact. But the undeniable fact remains that, your reality is the ultimate reality. In spite of anything their realities might tell them, free-will does not exist if YOU say it doesn't.
HENCE, in my opinion, free-will does not exist - if does not exist in the eyes of the observer.

Sneha said...

so wat nxt on ur mind , to blog abt?

Namrata Mankame said...

I like the your concept of reality, What i see as green could very well be seen as red by someone else, but he must be calling it green! Reality is relative. Religion is one vague concept and based on belief, I refuse to believe that me putting flowers on something made of silver or iron or stone will make God happy. I dont have to say my prayers... I can just look at the sky and have a direct conversation with him. I can look at the ground for that matter or anywhere else. If God is everywhere, then why do people want to limit his(or her) existence in an idol, or a place?

Namrata Mankame said...

Also,
(I am about to be blasphemic), If God really wants us to stay hungry or say offer him/her flowers and silver and gold by making our life miserable, then is God really worth worshipping?

krishNONE said...

my view : immortality (aka nirvana, moksha, liberation from cycle of rebirth) can be achieved only by focusing on the ultimate(the infinite, the imageless, the almighty etc), but focusing on something that is not visible is very difficult and distracting, for the benefit of the general masses, an image of 'God' was created to help them concentrate(just as the tantras were made to help the common man better understand the vedas) But over the years the philosophy behind creating an image was lost and the image itself was believed to be god.

krishNONE said...

the reason behind saying prayers is more scientific than religious.
any human action involves synapses (neuron signals) there are about 10 quadrillion synapses in a child and about 1-5 quadrillion synapses in an adult. every synapse requires a potential difference, that causes an electromagnetic field. now suppose u chant a mantra continuously (that require a huge number of synapses) imagine the kind of electromagnetic energy u generate! channeling this energy, sages/sadhus were able to manipulate surroundings, communicate telepathically etc etc as we all have read in numerous stories. again, the reason WHY we pray or chant mantras was lost and the only reason that remained was - because god wants us to.

krishNONE said...

and as for your second comment, are you sure it is really 'god' who told us to do all of that, or was it some selfish pujari who told us?
classic case of spurious information being fed to us as 'reality' that hides us from the true and ultimate reality.

abstract said...

sorry to reply so late, but i thinking makes it difficult for me to express.
i would answer to your reply

"That is exactly the point i'm trying to make.
BUT WHO is this "Third-person/ observer above men" ? that is the question im trying to address through my post."

What makes you think that a third person, an observer of men is omnipotent as well? Isn't that just an assumption? Who is to say that a first person viewpoint is inferior to the third person viewpoint? Just because of the power to observe? Isn't that well balanced by the power to act wielded by the first person?

Let me ask you this... does each brain cell contribute to form your thought? If so, then is 'your' will, infact yours? or is it a statistical effect of each neuron struggling to express itself?

Are you composed of living cells or do organized living cells give rise to an intelligent being...you?

The question is the same, the answer is the same. But obviously you got the difference.

Personally speaking, my own principles do not let me differentiate between the creation and the creator. I won't say it is a sin, because I don't believe in the organized religion's definition of sin, I would say it would be (biased?naive?) to separate the collective existence and the individual existence and frame of reference. I do not think one is greater than the other, I do not think that God is somewhere 'out there'. I believe that the distinction between Us and God cannot be made. Attempting to define God, as an entity would be just inaccurate, and the harder the attempt, the higher the inaccuracy.

abstract said...

is it about immortality?
i think it is much simpler than that, eternal happiness and satisfaction